However, the Senate Appropriation Committee’s Chairman, Danjuma Goje, acknowledged that the three months delay before implementation could have been avoided if the Budget was presented to the Legislature in good time.
Nevertheless, some political leaders and financial experts and analysts have encouraged public perception that, once the budget is passed, the pressure from the present challenging economic environment would begin to diffuse.
Nevertheless, although Buhari’s 2016 budget may indeed be the highest ever, fiscal plan by any administration, in nominal terms; however, the 2013 N4.98tn budget with the prevailing exchange rate of N160=$1 may actually be worth more in real terms. Thus, optical nominal escalation of budgets will not guarantee more social dividends if further Naira devaluation occurs.
So, ultimately, what are the
assurances that the 2016 budget would succeed where others failed? Indeed, if
truth be told, the early signals do not inspire much hope; arguably, no
appropriation bill, in our history, has so embarrassed the sponsor as this
year’s plan.
Curiously,
the National Assembly obviously also saw nothing wrong in approving a budget,
in which about N500bn (i.e. 8%) is set aside as intervention funds, without a
clear strategic expenditure plan that will guide accountability, transparency
and efficiency in the disbursement of funds.
It is equally worrisome, that
despite the collapse of crude oil prices and the troubling reality that we
presently require 35kobo out of every Naira income to service existing debts,
the Legislators paid little regard to endorsing substantial additional loans
despite the oppressive interest rates required to fund the N2.2tn projected
deficit.
Conversely, Buhari would have demonstrated an appropriate patriotic
presidential concern that generations to come will not become shackled by a
crippling debt burden, if the 2016 projected deficit can be funded with the
alleged, substantial recovered looted funds and the reported surplus funds
consolidated from operating the Treasury Single Account, rather than the
adoption of further debt accumulation to finance the deficit.
It is also bewildering
nonetheless, that inspite of the several contentious issues surrounding the
integrity of the 2016 bill, the National Assembly, only felt compelled, after
presumed, diligent consideration, to reduce only N17bn from the liberal N6.08tn
initially projected in Buhari’s plan. Nonetheless, the high expenditure
projection of N6.08tn has been lauded as a reflationary budget, inexplicably,
at a time inflation is rising uncomfortably beyond 11%, i.e. well beyond CBN’s
target of 9%, and certainly miles away from best practice rates below 2%, in
successful economies everywhere.
Its assumes that Nigeria’s economic
downturn is the product of acute shortage of money; thus, making much more
money available for spending should expectedly stimulate economic activity and
create more jobs. Ironically, however, the CBN as the sole author of money
supply in Nigeria, would beg to differ on this issue of the allegedly benign
impact of excess money supply.
Infact for decades, the CBN has
engaged in an unending battle to reduce excess money supply from the system.
Evidently, systemic excess money supply is actually the number one enemy
against the achievement of CBN’s core mandate to ensure that the general price
level does not rise above 2% annually, while cost of funds would also be kept
at levels that would encourage and support boisterous inclusive economy.
on March 22nd, a day just or so
before the Legislature’s approval of budget 2016. Consequently, CBN raised the
cost at which it would lend to commercial banks from 11% to 12%, and similarly
raised the percentage of customers’ deposits that the banks must keep as
reserves with the apex bank from 20% to 22%. The object of these directives, is
obviously to instigate commercial banks to also raise their interest rates on
loans to their own customers; similarly, the increase in cash reserve ratio is
also designed to reduce the amount of funds that banks can lend out to
customers.
So in a rather farcical twist, while
Buhari is being commended for proposing to spend big in order to stimulate
consumption and build infrastructures, the CBN, which alternately manages money
supply and monetary policy is busy restricting access to loanable funds and
infact ensuring that all borrowers, including the real sector, will become
discouraged from seeking loans, when for example, it costs over 20% to
Paradoxically, in order to compensate for this fauxpas, the CBN usually
responds by compulsively creating and injecting intervention funds to special
sectors.
Regrettably, these intervention
funds further compound an already excess money supply, and therefore
inadvertently also instigate further inflationary push, which the CBN would
again respond to by increasing its rate of borrowing with Treasury Bills,
despite the attendant high interest paid on these idle deposits.
Ultimately, with Buhari and the
CBN’s best intentions, the harsh economic times may remain for sometime.
The National Assembly
approved the 2016 Appropriation Bill, just a day before recess, on the
Wednesday 23rd of March; the approval was a fulfillment of the
Appropriation Committees’ promise to do the needful before the Easter
break.
Read more at: http://www.vanguardngr.com/2016/03/economy-buhari-cbn-pulling-apart/
Read more at: http://www.vanguardngr.com/2016/03/economy-buhari-cbn-pulling-apart/
The National Assembly
approved the 2016 Appropriation Bill, just a day before recess, on the
Wednesday 23rd of March; the approval was a fulfillment of the
Appropriation Committees’ promise to do the needful before the Easter
break.
However, the Senate Appropriation Committee’s Chairman, Danjuma Goje,
acknowledged that the three months delay before implementation could
have been avoided if the Budget was presented to the Legislature in good
time.
Read more at: http://www.vanguardngr.com/2016/03/economy-buhari-cbn-pulling-apart/
Read more at: http://www.vanguardngr.com/2016/03/economy-buhari-cbn-pulling-apart/
The National Assembly
approved the 2016 Appropriation Bill, just a day before recess, on the
Wednesday 23rd of March; the approval was a fulfillment of the
Appropriation Committees’ promise to do the needful before the Easter
break.
However, the Senate Appropriation Committee’s Chairman, Danjuma Goje,
acknowledged that the three months delay before implementation could
have been avoided if the Budget was presented to the Legislature in good
time.
Read more at: http://www.vanguardngr.com/2016/03/economy-buhari-cbn-pulling-apart/
Read more at: http://www.vanguardngr.com/2016/03/economy-buhari-cbn-pulling-apart/
The National Assembly
approved the 2016 Appropriation Bill, just a day before recess, on the
Wednesday 23rd of March; the approval was a fulfillment of the
Appropriation Committees’ promise to do the needful before the Easter
break.
However, the Senate Appropriation Committee’s Chairman, Danjuma Goje,
acknowledged that the three months delay before implementation could
have been avoided if the Budget was presented to the Legislature in good
time.
Read more at: http://www.vanguardngr.com/2016/03/economy-buhari-cbn-pulling-apart/
Read more at: http://www.vanguardngr.com/2016/03/economy-buhari-cbn-pulling-apart/
No comments:
Post a Comment